Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Curr Opin Pulm Med ; 27(3): 199-204, 2021 05 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2267780

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: In under a year, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has taken the lives of hundreds of thousands of Americans, leaving millions of survivors in its wake. The enormous number of people who survived acute illness but continue to have symptoms has highlighted the need for standardized evaluation of the post-COVID-19 patient. This review, based on the current literature and our experience, aims to guide the care of patients who have survived COVID-19. RECENT FINDINGS: The literature on this topic is rapidly expanding and covers both pulmonary and nonpulmonary complications of COVID-19. Pulmonary complications include dyspnea with normoxia, organizing pneumonia and pulmonary fibrosis. Nonpulmonary complications include neurologic, cardiac, and thromboembolic disease. Special consideration should be taken for COVID-19 survivors of intensive care. SUMMARY: The current review outlines the major clinical findings in post-COVID-19 patients and provides a guidelines to the evaluation and management of prolonged symptoms.


Subject(s)
Aftercare/methods , COVID-19/rehabilitation , Critical Illness/rehabilitation , SARS-CoV-2/pathogenicity , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/physiopathology , COVID-19/therapy , Critical Care/methods , Humans , Rehabilitation Research , Survivors
2.
Ann Am Thorac Soc ; 19(7): 1158-1168, 2022 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1923731

ABSTRACT

Rationale: The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic has led to a dramatic increase in the number of survivors of critical illness. These survivors are at increased risk for physical, psychological, and cognitive impairments known collectively as post-intensive care syndrome (PICS). Little is known about the prevalence of PICS in COVID-19 survivors. Objectives: To report the prevalence of physical, psychological, and cognitive impairment among COVID-19 intensive care unit (ICU) survivors receiving follow-up care in an ICU recovery clinic, to assess for associations between PICS and ICU-related factors, and to compare the cohort of ICU survivors who attended a post-ICU clinic with a cohort of ICU survivors who did not. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of COVID-19 ICU survivors admitted from March to May 2020 who were subsequently seen in a post-ICU recovery clinic in New York City. We abstracted medical chart data on available clinical screening instruments for physical, psychological, and cognitive impairment. Associations between these outcomes and care-related variables were tested. Baseline characteristics and in-hospital treatments of the post-ICU clinic cohort were compared with those of COVID-19 ICU survivors from the same institution who were not seen in the post-ICU clinic. Results: Eighty-seven COVID-19 ICU survivors were seen in our post-ICU recovery clinic. The median age was 62 years, and 74% were male. The median length of hospitalization was 51 days, and the median length of ICU stay was 22 days. At the post-ICU follow-up visit, 29%, 21%, and 13% of patients reported clinically significant levels of depressive symptoms, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms, respectively. Twenty-five percent had cognitive impairment. The overall prevalence of PICS was 90%. There were no associations between length of ICU stay, delirium, and exposure to benzodiazepines, steroids, or systemic paralytics with positive screening results for physical, psychological, or cognitive impairment. Baseline characteristics and ICU-related factors were similar in the cohort of COVID-19 ICU survivors who attended the ICU recovery clinic and those who did not. Conclusions: PICS is common in COVID-19 survivors. We did not find any association with length of ICU stay or the use of benzodiazepines, steroids, or paralytics.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Benzodiazepines , COVID-19/epidemiology , Cohort Studies , Critical Care/methods , Critical Illness/epidemiology , Critical Illness/psychology , Female , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Male , Middle Aged , New York City/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Survivors/psychology
3.
Am J Pathol ; 192(7): 1001-1015, 2022 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1906700

ABSTRACT

Vascular injury is a well-established, disease-modifying factor in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) pathogenesis. Recently, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-induced injury to the vascular compartment has been linked to complement activation, microvascular thrombosis, and dysregulated immune responses. This study sought to assess whether aberrant vascular activation in this prothrombotic context was associated with the induction of necroptotic vascular cell death. To achieve this, proteomic analysis was performed on blood samples from COVID-19 subjects at distinct time points during ARDS pathogenesis (hospitalized at risk, N = 59; ARDS, N = 31; and recovery, N = 12). Assessment of circulating vascular markers in the at-risk cohort revealed a signature of low vascular protein abundance that tracked with low platelet levels and increased mortality. This signature was replicated in the ARDS cohort and correlated with increased plasma angiopoietin 2 levels. COVID-19 ARDS lung autopsy immunostaining confirmed a link between vascular injury (angiopoietin 2) and platelet-rich microthrombi (CD61) and induction of necrotic cell death [phosphorylated mixed lineage kinase domain-like (pMLKL)]. Among recovery subjects, the vascular signature identified patients with poor functional outcomes. Taken together, this vascular injury signature was associated with low platelet levels and increased mortality and can be used to identify ARDS patients most likely to benefit from vascular targeted therapies.


Subject(s)
Angiopoietin-2 , COVID-19 , Necroptosis , Respiratory Distress Syndrome , Angiopoietin-2/metabolism , COVID-19/complications , Humans , Proteomics , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/virology
4.
CHEST ; 160(4):A879-A879, 2021.
Article in English | Academic Search Complete | ID: covidwho-1460754
5.
Am J Perinatol ; 37(10): 1044-1051, 2020 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-612524

ABSTRACT

Pregnant patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, the virus responsible for the clinical condition newly described in 2019 as coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and illness severity to warrant intensive care have a complex disease process that must involve multiple disciplines. Guidelines from various clinical societies, along with direction from local health authorities, must be considered when approaching the care of an obstetric patient with known or suspected COVID-19. With a rapidly changing landscape, a simplified and cohesive perspective using guidance from different clinical society recommendations regarding the critically-ill obstetric patient with COVID-19 is needed. In this article, we synthesize various high-level guidelines of clinical relevance in the management of pregnant patients with severe disease or critical illness due to COVID-19. KEY POINTS: · When caring for severely ill obstetric patients with COVID-19, one must be well versed in the complications that may need to be managed including, but not limited to adult respiratory distress syndrome with need for mechanical ventilation, approach to refractory hypoxemia, hemodynamic shock, and multiorgan system failure.. · Prone positioning can be done safely in gravid patients but requires key areas of support to avoid abdominal compression.. · For the critically ill obstetric patient with COVID-19, the focus should be on supportive care as a bridge to recovery rather than delivery as a solution to recovery..


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Critical Care/methods , Delivery, Obstetric/methods , Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/epidemiology , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/epidemiology , COVID-19 , Comorbidity , Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Delivery, Obstetric/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Pandemics/prevention & control , Patient Positioning/methods , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/prevention & control , Pregnancy Outcome , Pregnancy, High-Risk , Risk Assessment , Thromboembolism/prevention & control , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL